Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> On 03/30/18 16:21, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I did not like the proposed test case too much, particularly not its
>> undocumented API change for check_pg_config,
> Other than that API change, was there something the test case could have
> done differently to make you like it more?
Well, if that'd been properly documented I'd probably have pushed it
without complaint. But I did wonder whether it could've been folded
into one of the existing tests of pg_switch_wal(). This doesn't seem
like a property worth spending a lot of cycles on testing.
regards, tom lane
