On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, at 17:03, Isaac Morland wrote: > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 10:20, Joel Jacobson <j...@compiler.org> wrote: > > Foreign key constraint names have been given the same names as the referenced > tables. > > While I agree this could be a simple approach in many real cases for having > easy to understand FK constraint names, I > wonder if for illustration and explaining the feature if it might work better > to use names that are completely unique so that > it's crystal clear that the names are constraint names, not table names.
Good point, I agree. New version below: FROM permission p LEFT JOIN KEY p.permission_role_id_fkey r LEFT JOIN team_role tr KEY team_role_role_id_fkey REF r LEFT JOIN KEY tr.team_role_team_id_fkey t LEFT JOIN user_role ur KEY user_role_role_id_fkey REF r LEFT JOIN KEY ur.user_role_user_id_fkey u WHERE p.id = 1; Thoughts? /Joel
