On 24.12.21 09:04, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
Still, as Fujii-san concerns, I'm afraid that some people may suffer
the degradation the patch causes.  I wonder it is acceptable to get
back the previous behavior by exposing SEQ_LOG_VALS itself or a
boolean to do that, as a 'not-recommended-to-use' variable.

There is also the possibility of unlogged sequences if you want to avoid the WAL logging and get higher performance.


Reply via email to