At Tue, 28 Dec 2021 20:32:40 -0600, Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote
in
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:53:23AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:17:54PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > One option is to expose the GUC flags in pg_settings, so this can all be
> > done
> > in SQL regression tests.
> >
> > Maybe the flags should be text strings, so it's a nicer user-facing
> > interface.
> > But then the field would be pretty wide, even though we're only adding it
> > for
> > regression tests. The only other alternative I can think of is to make a
> > sql-callable function like pg_get_guc_flags(text guc).
>
> Rebased on cab5b9ab2c066ba904f13de2681872dcda31e207.
>
> And added 0003, which changes to instead exposes the flags as a function, to
> avoid changing pg_settings and exposing internally-defined integer flags in
> that somewhat prominent view.
Just an idea but couldn't we use flags in a series of one-letter flag
representations? It is more user-friendly than integers but shorter
than full-text representation.
+SELECT name, flags FROM pg_settings;
name | flags
------------------------+--------
application_name | ARsec
transaction_deferrable | Arsec
transaction_isolation | Arsec
transaction_read_only | Arsec
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
