I corrected it according to your suggestion.

thanks

Wenjing.


Zhihong Yu <z...@yugabyte.com> 于2021年12月25日周六 02:26写道:

>
>
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 3:52 AM 曾文旌(义从) <wenjing....@alibaba-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Fixed a bug found during testing.
>>
>>
>> Wenjing
>>
>>
>>>> Hi,
> +           if (condition_is_safe_pushdown_to_sublink(rinfo,
> expr_info->outer))
> +           {
> +               /* replace qual expr from outer var = const to var = const
> and push down to sublink query */
> +               sublink_query_push_qual(subquery, (Node
> *)copyObject(rinfo->clause), expr_info->outer, expr_info->inner);
>
> Since sublink_query_push_qual() is always guarded
> by condition_is_safe_pushdown_to_sublink(), it seems
> sublink_query_push_qual() can be folded into
> condition_is_safe_pushdown_to_sublink().
>
> For generate_base_implied_equalities():
>
> +       if (ec->ec_processed)
> +       {
> +           ec_index++;
> +           continue;
> +       }
> +       else if (list_length(ec->ec_members) > 1)
>
> Minor comment: the keyword `else` can be omitted (due to `continue` above).
>
> +            * Since there may be an unexpanded sublink in the targetList,
> +            * we'll skip it for now.
>
> Since there may be an -> If there is an
>
> +       {"lazy_process_sublink", PGC_USERSET, QUERY_TUNING_METHOD,
> +           gettext_noop("enable lazy process sublink."),
>
> Looking at existing examples from src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c,
> enable_lazy_sublink_processing seems to be consistent with existing guc
> variable naming.
>
> +lazy_process_sublinks(PlannerInfo *root, bool single_result_rte)
>
> lazy_process_sublinks -> lazily_process_sublinks
>
> +   else
> +   {
>     /* There shouldn't be any OJ info to translate, as yet */
>     Assert(subroot->join_info_list == NIL);
>
> Indentation for the else block is off.
>
> +       if (istop)
> +           f->quals = preprocess_expression_ext(root, f->quals,
> EXPRKIND_QUAL, false);
> +       else
> +           f->quals = preprocess_expression_ext(root, f->quals,
> EXPRKIND_QUAL, true);
>
> The above can be written as:
>
> +           f->quals = preprocess_expression_ext(root, f->quals,
> EXPRKIND_QUAL, !istop);
>
> For find_equal_conditions_contain_uplevelvar_in_sublink_query():
> +               context.has_unexpected_expr == false &&
> `!context.has_unexpected_expr` should suffice
>
> equal_expr_safety_check -> is_equal_expr_safe
>
> Cheers
>
>

Attachment: 0001-poc-pushdown-qual-to-sublink-v5.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to