On Wed, 2021-12-15 at 12:23 -0800, Mark Dilger wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2021, at 4:30 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
> >
> > We need to do permission checking for WITH CHECK OPTION and RLS.
> > The
> > patch right now allows the subscription to write data that an RLS
> > policy forbids.
>
> Version 4 of the patch, attached, no longer allows RLS to be
> circumvented, but does so in a course-grained fashion.
Committed.
I tried to do some performance testing to see if there was any impact
of the extra catalog + ACL checks. Logical replication seems slow
enough -- something like 3X slower than local inserts -- that it didn't
seem to make a difference.
To test it, I did the following:
1. sent a SIGSTOP to the logical apply worker
2. loaded more data in publisher
3. made the subscriber a sync replica
4. timed the following:
a. sent a SIGCONT to the logical apply worker
b. insert a single tuple on the publisher side
c. wait for the insert to return, indicating that logical
replication is done up to that point
Does anyone have a better way to measure logical replication
performance?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
