Hi, On 2022-01-10 01:14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > Fun! That seems to me to be a strong argument for not letting > the behavior vary depending on isatty().
Yea. > I think I'd vote for just nuking that output altogether. > It seems of very dubious value. It seems worthwhile in some form - on large cluster in copy mode, the "Copying user relation files" step can take *quite* a while, and even link/clone mode aren't fast. But perhaps what'd be really needed is something counting up actual progress in percentage of files and/or space... I think just coupling it to verbose mode makes the most sense, for now? Greetings, Andres Freund
