As promised, here is the remaining data: 1 worker, w/o patch: 5236 ms +/- 252ms 1 worker, w/ patch: 5529 ms +/- 168ms
2 worker, w/o patch: 4917 ms +/- 180ms 2 worker, w/ patch: 4745 ms +/- 169ms 4 worker, w/o patch: 6564 ms +/- 336ms 4 worker, w/ patch: 6105 ms +/- 177ms 8 worker, w/o patch: 9575 ms +/- 2375ms 8 worker, w/ patch: 8115 ms +/- 391ms 16 worker, w/o patch: 19367 ms +/- 3543ms 16 worker, w/ patch: 18004 ms +/- 3701ms 32 worker, w/o patch: 101509 ms +/- 22651ms 32 worker, w/ patch: 104234 ms +/- 26821ms 48 worker, w/o patch: 243329 ms +/- 70037ms 48 worker, w/ patch: 189965 ms +/- 79459ms 64 worker, w/o patch: 552443 ms +/- 22841ms 64 worker, w/ patch: 502727 ms +/- 45253ms From this data, on average the patch is beneficial at high worker (CPU) counts tested: 48, 63. At 32 and below the performance is relatively close to each other. Thanks, Geoff
