On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:35 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:01:37AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 1:34 PM James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As I understand the current code, parallel plans are largely chosen > >> based not on where it's safe to insert a Gather node but rather by > >> determining if a given path is parallel safe. Through that lens params > >> are a bit of an odd man out -- they aren't inherently unsafe in the > >> way a parallel-unsafe function is, but they can only be used in > >> parallel plans under certain conditions (whether because of project > >> policy, performance, or missing infrastructure). > > > > Right. > > Please note that the CF bot is complaining here, so I have moved this > patch to the next CF, but changed the status as waiting on author.
I rebased this back in December, but somehow forgot to reply with the updated patch, so, here it is finally. Thanks, James Coleman
v4-0001-Allow-parallel-LATERAL-subqueries-with-LIMIT-OFFS.patch
Description: Binary data
v4-0002-Parallel-query-support-for-basic-correlated-subqu.patch
Description: Binary data
v4-0003-Other-places-to-consider-for-completeness.patch
Description: Binary data
