On 1/17/22, 5:24 PM, "Michael Paquier" <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:19:41AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: >> Given that the code has remained unchanged since the function was >> introduced in 9.5, it seems reasonable to change the documentation >> to match the function behaviour rather than the other way round. > > Obviously. I'll go fix that as you suggest, if there are no > objections.
+1 Nathan
