On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 03:24:02PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 21.01.22 14:51, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > Is that change intended? There isn't any usage of the collversionstr before > > the possible error when actual_versionstr is missing. > > I wanted to move it closer to the SysCacheGetAttr() where the "datum" value > is obtained. It seemed weird to get the datum, then do other things, then > decode the datum.
Oh ok. It won't make much difference performance-wise, so no objection.
