On 1/25/22, 12:01 AM, "Michael Paquier" <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > So, where are we on this patch? It looks like there is an agreement > that MaxBackends is used widely enough that it justifies the use of a > separate function to set and get a better value computed. There may > be other parameters that could use a brush up, but most known cases > would be addressed here. v4 looks rather straight-forward, at quick > glance.
I think the patch is in decent shape. There may be a few remaining places where GetMaxBackends() is called repeatedly in the same function, but IIRC v4 already clears up the obvious ones. I don't know if this is worth worrying about too much, but I can create a new version if you think it is important. Nathan
