On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > So apparently we need to either skip this test when wal_level=minimal, > > or force a higher wal_level to be used for this particular test. Not > > sure what the existing precedents are, if any. > > The only precedent I've found so far is test_decoding, which sets wal_level > to "logical." Perhaps we can just set it to "replica" in > basic_archive.conf.
Yeah, that seems to make sense. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
