On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 10:01:42PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > I don't get it. If you're missing WAL it means that will you have to do that > tedious manual work to retrieve them no matter what. So on top of that > tedious > work, you also have to make sure that you don't provide a bogus start > position.
I may be wrong in saying that, but the primary use case I have seen for pg_receivewal is a service integration for archiving. > Maybe that's a good idea but I'm still having a hard time imagining a scenario > where it would actually be a good idea. With the defaults that we have now in place (current LSN location, current slot's location or the archive location), I am not really convinced that we need more control in this area with the proposed option. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
