On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:35:50PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > How about something like LOG_AS_CLONE? That makes it clear, I hope, > that we're logging it a different way, but that method of logging it > is different in each case. You'd still have to read the documentation > to find out what it really means, but at least it seems like it points > you more in the right direction. To me, anyway.
I think CLONE would be confusing since we don't use that term often, maybe LOG_DB_COPY or LOG_FILE_COPY? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
