On 2022-02-13 12:36:13 +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > Actually, I'm working on simplifying and improving radix tree > implementation for PG16 dev cycle. From the discussion so far I think > it's better to have a data structure that can be used for > general-purpose and is also good for storing TID, not very specific to > store TID. So I think radix tree would be a potent candidate. I have > done the insertion and search implementation.
Awesome!
