Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13

[Tom Lane]

Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> writes:
> Good.  The revised patch is attached.  Instead of adding argument to
> LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN(), it introduces separate LTREE_GET_SIGLEN() and
> LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN() macros.

Um ... what I see after applying the patch is two redundant
definitions of LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN, and no LTREE_GET_SIGLEN.

                        regards, tom lane