On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:23:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 07:14:11AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Anyway there's no compelling reason to not use the default. If we were to > > use > > a non-default default, we'd have to choose between 1 and 2 (or some negative > > compression level). My thinking was that zstd-1 would give the > > lowest-hanging > > fruits for zstd, while minimizing performance tradeoff, since WAL affects > > interactivity. But choosing between 1 and 2 seems like bikeshedding. > > Yeah, I have looked again at the patch today, and I saw no reason to > not apply it to give more options to the user as zstd or lz4 are both > good in their own ways. So done, with the default level used.
It's great news - thanks. -- Justin
