On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 01:12:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> writes: > > we can rely on %lld/%llu and we decided to use them in translatable strings. > > Seems like good cleanup, so pushed. I think though that project style > is to use "long long" or "unsigned long long", without the unnecessary > "int" --- it certainly makes little sense to do it both ways in the > same patch.
This seemed familiar - it's about the same thing I sent here, while fixing ftello(). https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20210104025321.ga9...@telsasoft.com 0002-Fix-broken-error-message-on-unseekable-input.patch -- Justin
