> On Mar 22, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Seems like it might actually be good to test that object access hooks work > well in a parallel worker. How about going the other way and explicitly > setting > force_parallel_mode = disabled for parts of the test and to enabled for > others? Wouldn't we get differing numbers of NOTICE messages depending on how many parallel workers there are? Or would you propose setting the number of workers to a small, fixed value? — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Tom Lane
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andrew Dunstan
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andrew Dunstan
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andres Freund
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andrew Dunstan
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Tom Lane
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andres Freund
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Justin Pryzby
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Tom Lane
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andres Freund
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Mark Dilger
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Tom Lane
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andres Freund
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Mark Dilger
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andrew Dunstan
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Mark Dilger
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Thomas Munro
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Mark Dilger
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Andrew Dunstan
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Mark Dilger
- Re: New Object Access Type hooks Tom Lane