Hi, On 2022-03-26 17:04:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Hmm, looks like the gcc folk aren't too sure either ;-).
Heh, yea ;) > Okay, so we can change this code, or just do nothing and wait for > a repaired gcc. Since that's an unreleased version there's no > concern about any possible bug in-the-wild. I think it probably > should come down to whether we think the predecrement form is > indeed more readable. Agreed. > I'm about +0.1 towards changing, what do you think? Similar. Greetings, Andres Freund
