On 2022-Apr-02, Andres Freund wrote: > 6) Should any part of the "reuse_stats" logic in table_recheck_autovac() be > kept? > > With the shared memory stats patch, autovacuum can cheaply access individual > stats, so the whole scheme for avoiding stats accesses is moot.
Agreed, I don't think there's need to keep any of that. > I don't really see a point in keeping any of it - but I was curious whether > anybody else does? I don't either. > I'm still polishing, so I didn't want to send a whole new version with these > adjustments to the list yet, but you can see the state as of the time of > sending this email at [1]. I'll have a look, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/