On 2022-04-05 16:42:28 +0000, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote: > > Why isn't the obvious thing to do here to provide a way to associate > > workers > > with their leaders in shared memory, but to use the existing progress > > fields > > to report progress? Then, when querying progress, the leader and workers > > progress fields can be combined to show the overall progress? > > The original intent was this, however the workers > can exit before the command completes and the > worker progress data will be lost.
Can't the progress data trivially be inferred by the fact that the worker completed?
