On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:58 AM Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
> On 4/7/22 12:37, Tom Lane wrote: > > Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > >>> On Apr 7, 2022, at 9:29 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> I wouldn't > >>> fight too hard if people want to lengthen it to \dconfig for > consistency > >>> with set_config(). > > > >> I'd prefer \dconfig, but if the majority on this list view that as > pedantically forcing them to type more, I'm not going to kick up a fuss > about \dconf. > > > > Maybe I'm atypical, but I'm probably going to use tab completion > > either way, so it's not really more keystrokes. The consistency > > point is a good one that I'd not considered before. > > Yeah I had thought about \dconfig too -- +1 to that, although I am fine > with \dconf too. > > \dconfig[+] gets my vote. I was going to say "conf" just isn't common jargon to say or write; but the one place it is - file extensions - is relevant and common. But still, I would go with the non-jargon form. David J.
