On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 4:47 AM Markus Wanner <markus.wan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I agree with Michael, it would be nice to not duplicate the code, but > use a common underlying method. A modified patch is attached.
I don't think this is better, but I don't think it's worth arguing about, either, so I'll do it this way if nobody objects. Meanwhile, I've committed the patch for master to master. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com