On 4/11/22 3:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes:
On 4/9/22 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Sure, but then you do "\dconfig *".  With there being several hundred
GUCs (and no doubt more coming), I'm not sure that "show me every GUC"
is a common use-case at all, let alone so common as to deserve being
the default behavior.

One thing we could perhaps do to reduce confusion is to change the
table heading when doing this, say from "List of configuration parameters"
to "List of non-default configuration parameters".

Reasonable points. I don't have any objections to this proposal.

Hearing no further comments, done like that.

Thanks!

I have a usability comment based on my testing.

I ran "\dconfig" and one of the settings that came up was "max_connections" which was set to 100, or the default.

I had noticed that "max_connections" was uncommented in my postgresql.conf file, which I believe was from the autogenerated provided by initdb.

Similarly, min_wal_size/max_wal_size were in the list and set to their default values. These were also uncommented in my postgresql.conf from the autogeneration.

My question is if we're only going to list out the settings that are customized, are we going to:

1. Hide a setting if it matches a default value, even if a user set it to be the default value? OR
2. Comment out all of the settings in a generated postgresql.conf file?

Thanks,

Jonathan

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to