On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 at 14:53, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> > Minor doc patch to replace with latest RFC number
>
> Hmm, I'm a bit disinclined to claim compliance with a new RFC
> sight unseen.  What were the changes?

I checked... so I should have mentioned this before

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8259#appendix-A

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/


Reply via email to