I wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
>> BTW If you had your local change from debug.patch (upthread), that'd
>> defeat the patch. I mean this:
>> + if(!*errormsg)
>> + *errormsg = "decode_queue_head is null";
> Oh! Okay, I'll retry without that.
I've now done several runs with your patch and not seen the test failure.
However, I think we ought to rethink this API a bit rather than just
apply the patch as-is. Even if it were documented, relying on
errormsg = NULL to mean something doesn't seem like a great plan.
regards, tom lane
