At Wed, 27 Apr 2022 01:31:55 -0400, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in > Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:36:10PM +0800, Rui Zhao wrote: > >> Do you have interest in adding a test like one in my patch? > > > I have studied the test case you are proposing, and I am afraid that > > it is too expensive as designed. > > That was my feeling too. It's certainly a useful test for verifying > that we fixed the problem, but that doesn't mean that it's worth the > cycles to add it as a permanent fixture in check-world, even if we > could get rid of the timing assumptions.
My first feeling is the same. And I don't find a way to cause this cheap and reliably without inserting a dedicate debugging-aid code. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
