On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 12:50 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 6:50 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:28 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe some tunable like
> > > log_wal_traffic = { none, medium, high }
> > > where "none" is current behavior of no noise, "medium" gets (say) once
> > > every 256 segments (e.g., when going from XFF to (X+1)00), "high" gets
> > > you one message per segment.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 7:19 PM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you're talking about a new feature that uses the infrastructre from
> > > 9ce3,
> > > but is controlled by a separate GUC like log_wal_traffic, that could be
> > > okay.
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion. I've added a new GUC log_wal_traffic as
> > suggested above. PSA v7 patch.
>
> Here's the rebased v8 patch, please review it.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/37/3443/Here's the rebased v9 patch. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
v9-0001-Add-WAL-recovery-messages-with-log_wal_traffic-GU.patch
Description: Binary data
