Updated status of the set. On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 5:59 PM David G. Johnston < david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > v0001-database-default-name (-bugs, with a related cleanup suggestion as > well) > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKFQuwZvHH1HVSOu7EYjvshynk4pnDwC5RwkF%3DVfZJvmUskwrQ%40mail.gmail.com#0e6d799478d88aee93402bec35fa64a2 > > > v0002-doc-extension-dependent-routine-behavior (-general, reply to user > confusion) > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwb_QtY25feLeh%3D8uNdnyo1H%3DcN4R3vENsUwQzJP4-0xZg%40mail.gmail.com > > > v0001-doc-savepoint-name-reuse (-docs, reply to user request for > improvement) > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwYzSb9OW5qTFgc0v9RWMN8bX83wpe8okQ7x6vtcmfA2KQ%40mail.gmail.com > Pending discussion of alternate presentation of transaction sequence; if not favorable, I can just go with a simple factual fix of the mistake in v0001 (see this thread). > > v0001-on-conflict-excluded-is-name-not-table (-docs, figured out while > trying to improve the docs to reduce user confusion in this area) > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAKFQuwYN20c0%2B7kKvm3PBgibu77BzxDvk9RvoXBb1%3Dj1mDODPw%40mail.gmail.com#ea79c88b55fdccecbd2c4fe549f321c9 > > > v0001-doc-make-row-estimation-example-match-prose (-docs, reply to user > pointing of an inconsistency) > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwax7V5R_rw%3DEOWmy%3DTBON6v3sveBx_WvwsENskCL5CLQQ%40mail.gmail.com > David J.