Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On 28.04.22 18:50, Przemysław Sztoch wrote: >> Current unnaccent dictionary does not include many popular numeric symbols, >> in example: "m²" -> "m2"
> Seems reasonable.
It kinda feels like this is outside the charter of an "unaccent"
dictionary. I don't object to having these conversions available
but it seems like it ought to be a separate feature.
regards, tom lane
