Hi,

On 2022-05-05 23:57:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2022-05-05 23:36:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So I reluctantly vote for removing 031_recovery_conflict.pl in the
> >> back branches for now, with the expectation that we'll fix the
> >> infrastructure and put it back after the current release round
> >> is done.
> 
> > What about instead marking the flapping test TODO? That'd still give us most
> > of the coverage...
> 
> Are you sure there's just one test that's failing?  I haven't checked
> the buildfarm history close enough to be sure of that.  But if it's
> true, disabling just that one would be fine (again, as a stopgap
> measure).

I looked through all the failures I found and it's two kinds of failures, both
related to the deadlock test. So I'm thinking of skipping just that test as in
the attached.

Working on committing / backpatching that, unless somebody suggests changes
quickly...

Greetings,

Andres Freund
diff --git c/src/test/recovery/t/031_recovery_conflict.pl i/src/test/recovery/t/031_recovery_conflict.pl
index 52f00a6f514..72808095d21 100644
--- c/src/test/recovery/t/031_recovery_conflict.pl
+++ i/src/test/recovery/t/031_recovery_conflict.pl
@@ -228,6 +228,10 @@ check_conflict_stat("lock");
 
 
 ## RECOVERY CONFLICT 5: Deadlock
+SKIP:
+{
+	skip "disabled until after minor releases, due to instability";
+
 $sect = "startup deadlock";
 $expected_conflicts++;
 
@@ -286,6 +290,7 @@ check_conflict_stat("deadlock");
 
 # clean up for next tests
 $node_primary->safe_psql($test_db, qq[ROLLBACK PREPARED 'lock';]);
+}
 
 
 # Check that expected number of conflicts show in pg_stat_database. Needs to

Reply via email to