On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:07 AM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 7:30 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > LOG: still waiting for pid 1651417 to accept ProcSignalBarrier > > STATEMENT: alter database mydb set tablespace ts1;
> This is a very good idea. OK, I pushed this, after making the ereport call look a bit more like others that talk about backend PIDs. > > Another thought is that it might be nice to be able to test with a > > dummy PSB that doesn't actually do anything. You could use it to see > > how fast your system processes it, while doing various other things, > > and to find/debug problems in other code that fails to handle > > interrupts correctly. Here's an attempt at that. I guess it could go > > into a src/test/modules/something instead of core, but on the other > > hand the PSB itself has to be in core anyway, so maybe not. Thoughts? > > No documentation yet, just seeing if people think this is worth > > having... better names/ideas welcome. > > I did this at one point, but I wasn't convinced it was going to find > enough bugs to be worth committing. It's OK if you're convinced of > things that didn't convince me, though. I'll leave this here for now.
