On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 04:09:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Well, what about the attached then? While looking at all the headers > in the tree, I have noticed that __pg_log_level is not marked, but > we'd better paint a PGDLLIMPORT also for it? This is getting used by > pgbench for some unlikely() business, as one example.
After an extra look, PGDLLIMPORT missing from __pg_log_level looks like an imbroglio between 8ec5694, that has added the marking, and 9a374b77 that has removed it the same day. All that has been fixed in 5edeb57. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
