On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 5:05 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2022-May-14, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 1:57 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > We didn't have any use of TransactionId as members of List, until > > > RelationSyncEntry->streamed_txns was introduced (464824323e57, pg14). > > > It's currently implemented as a list of int. This is not wrong at > > > present, but it may soon be, and I'm sure it rubs some people the wrong > > > way. > > > > > > But is the rubbing way wrong enough to add support for TransactionId in > > > pg_list.h, including, say, T_XidList? > > > > +1. I don't know if we have a need for this at other places but I feel > > it is a good idea to make its current use better. > > I hesitate to add this the day just before beta. This is already in > pg14, so maybe it's not a big deal if pg15 remains the same for the time > being. Or we can change it for beta2. Or we could just punt until > pg16. Any preferences? >
I prefer to do this for pg16 unless we see some bug due to this. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
