On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > We, as in the core project, are not shipping it.
+1 for what JD said on that subject. > I'm also unclear > on why you want to exclude "fix the RPM packaging" as a reasonable > solution. Mostly because the complaint was about the *Debian* packaging. Other than that, it's possible that that's the way forward. > It seems likely that some change in that packaging would > be necessary anyway, as it wouldn't know today about any signaling > method we might choose to adopt. > > Having said that, I'm not averse to providing a solution if it's robust, > not too invasive and doesn't break other use-cases. So far we've not > seen a patch that meets those conditions. Fair enough. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
