Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > ParallelPortInfo sounds kind of right for the job to me in this set of > proposals, as the data is from the Port, and that's some information > shared between all the parallel workers and the leader.
I agree with Robert's complaint that Parallel is far too generic a term here. Also, the fact that this data is currently in struct Port seems like an artifact. Don't we have a term for the set of processes comprising a leader plus parallel workers? If we called that set FooGroup, then something like FooGroupSharedInfo would be on-point. regards, tom lane