Le ven. 3 juin 2022 à 19:29, Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 12:56:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Another option could be to move it after the "Input/Output" section so > that > >> it's closer to some other commands that involve files. I can't say I > have > >> a strong opinion about whether/where to move it, though. > > > > Yeah, I thought of that choice too, but it ends up placing the > > Large Objects section higher up the list than seems warranted on > > frequency-of-use grounds. > > Fair point. > > > After looking at the output I concluded that we'd be better off to > > stick with the normal indentation amount, and break the lo_import > > entry into two lines to make that work. One reason for this is > > that some translators might've already settled on a different > > indentation amount in order to cope with translated parameter names, > > and deviating from the normal here will just complicate their lives. > > So that leaves me proposing v5. > > I see. As you noted earlier, moving the entries higher makes the > inconsistent indentation less appealing, too. So this LGTM. > > Sounds good to me too. Thanks. -- Guillaume.
