Hi, On 2022-07-01 15:13:16 -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:05:55PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2022-07-01 14:56:42 -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote: > >> The unparenthesized syntax for VACUUM has been marked deprecated since v9.1 > >> (ad44d50). Should it be removed in v16? If not, should we start emitting > >> WARNINGs when it is used? > > > > What would we gain? ISTM that the number of scripts and typing habits that'd > > be broken would vastly exceed the benefit. > > Beyond removing a few lines from gram.y and vacuum.sgml, probably not much. > If it isn't going to be removed, IMO we should consider removing the > deprecation notice in the docs.
Still serves as an explanation as to why newer options haven't been / won't be added in an unparenthesized manner. And maybe there one day will be reason to remove them, e.g. grammar ambiguities. Greetings, Andres Freund
