Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 08:56:36PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> views.sgml is a pretty generic name for a chapter that just contains system >> views.
> Yes, I struggled with that. What made me choose "views" is that the > current name was catalogs.sgml, not syscatalogs.sgml. If is acceptable > to use catalogs.sgml and sysviews.sgml? "catalogs" isn't too confusable with user-defined objects, so I think that name is fine --- and anyway it has decades of history so changing it seems unwise. We seem to have been trending towards less-abbreviated .sgml file names over time, so personally I'd go for system-views.sgml. regards, tom lane