On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 09:10:52AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I suggest that if log_startup_progress_interval doesn't meet your > needs here, we should try to understand why not and maybe enhance it, > instead of adding a separate facility.
+1. AFAICT it should be possible to make the log_startup_progress_interval machinery extensible enough to be reused for several other tasks that can take a while but have little visibility. Since this thread has been inactive for over 2 months, I'm marking the commitfest entry as Waiting on Author. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
