At Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:58:16 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote in > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 9:58 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Mmm. the patch changed that behavior. AllocateSnapshotBuilder always > > allocate the array with a fixed size. SnapBuildAddCommittedTxn still > > assumes builder->committed.xip is non-NULL. SnapBuildRestore *kept* > > ondisk.builder.commited.xip populated with a valid array pointer. But > > the patch allows committed.xip be NULL, thus in that case, > > SnapBuildAddCommitedTxn calls repalloc(NULL) which triggers assertion > > failure. > > IIUC the patch doesn't allow committed.xip to be NULL since we don't > overwrite it if builder->committed.xcnt is 0 (i.e., > ondisk.builder.committed.xip is NULL):
I meant that ondisk.builder.committed.xip can be NULL.. But looking again that cannot be. I don't understand what I was looking at at that time. So, sorry for the noise. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
