Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Reaction to this patch seems tentatively positive so far, so I have
> committed it. Maybe someone will still show up to complain ... but I
> think it's a good change, so I hope not.
I had not actually read the patch, but now that I have, it's got
a basic typing error:
+ bool should_be_super = BoolGetDatum(boolVal(dissuper->arg));
+
+ if (!should_be_super && roleid == BOOTSTRAP_SUPERUSERID)
+ ereport(ERROR,
The result of BoolGetDatum is not bool, it's Datum. This is
probably harmless, but it's still a typing violation.
You want something like
bool should_be_super = boolVal(dissuper->arg);
...
new_record[Anum_pg_authid_rolsuper - 1] = BoolGetDatum(should_be_super);
regards, tom lane
