On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:32 AM Erik Rijkers <e...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > The part of the sentence inside parentheses is not clear to me, before
> > or after the patch:
> >
> > Dropping an extension causes its component objects, and other
> > explicitly
> > dependent routines (see <xref linkend="sql-alterroutine"/>,
> > - the depends on extension action), to be dropped as well.
> > + that depend on extension action), to be dropped as well.
> > </para>
> >
>
> Hm, I see what you mean, I did not notice that earlier and I won't make
> a guess as to intention. Maybe Bruce can have another look? (commit
> 5fe2d4c56e)
I think that it's talking about this (documented) syntax:
ALTER ROUTINE name [ ( [ [ argmode ] [ argname ] argtype [, ...] ] ) ]
[ NO ] DEPENDS ON EXTENSION extension_name
So the change from "depends" to "depend" here is incorrect. Maybe we
can say something like:
the <literal>DEPENDS ON EXTENSION
<replaceable>extension_name</replaceable><literal> action
(I haven't tested whether this markup works.)
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
