On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 12:29 AM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's v2 patch, passing progress report interval as an input to > begin_progress_report_phase() so that the processes can use their own > intervals(hard-coded or GUC) if they wish to not use the generic GUC > log_progress_report_interval.
I don't think we should rename the GUC to be more generic. I like it the way that it is. I also think you should extend this patch series with 1 or 2 additional patches showing where else you think we should be using this infrastructure. If no such places exist, this is pointless. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
