On 2022-Aug-10, Robert Haas wrote: > David Steele voted for back-patching this on the grounds that it would > make future back-patching easier, which is an argument that seems to > me to have some merit, although on the other hand, we are already into > August so it's quite late in the day. Anyone else want to vote?
Given that 10 of these 11 files are new in 15, I definitely agree with backpatching the move. Moving the include/ files is going to cause some pain for any third-party code #including those files. I don't think this is a problem. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
