On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:37 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > With a bit of work, we could probably get rid of those includes. See > > 27199058d98ef7f for one example. > > Yeah --- it would mean creating gram.h files for all the bison grammars > not just a few of them, but it's certainly do-able if there's motivation > to make the changes. Most of the files that are done that way date > from before we knew about flex's %top.
I'll volunteer to work on this unless an easier solution happens to come along in the next couple days. (aside: guc-file.l doesn't have a grammar, so not yet sure if that makes the issue easier or harder...) -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
