Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > Right, but as Tom pointed it is still better to change this. However, > I am not sure if we should backpatch this to PG15 as this won't lead > to any incorrect behavior.
If that code only exists in HEAD and v15 then I'd backpatch.
It's a very low-risk change and it might avoid merge problems
for future backpatches.
regards, tom lane
