Hi, On 2022-08-23 13:18:49 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > Taking RMT hat off, if the outcome is "revert", I do want to ensure we don't > lose momentum on getting this into v16. I know a lot of time and effort has > gone into this featureset and it seems to be trending in the right > direction. We have a mixed history on reverts in terms of if/when they are > committed and I don't want to see that happen to these features. I do think > this will remain a headline feature even if we delay it for v16.
We could decide to revert this for 15, but leave it in tree for HEAD. Greetings, Andres Freund
